> << Stick to the text. Forget about the > author. >> > > Lets just all stick to our opinions. How about that? You cannot forget about > the author while reading his text. It's like watching comedy with Al Pacino. Whaa ??? Seriously - I think what Jim's saying is we should not look to JDS for the Truth. Our interpretation is every bit as valid as his - that's what happens once you put a text out into the world. Just because he wrote it doesn't mean that his opinion on it is Correct. There *is* no right or wrong answer; we're never going to arrive at an ultimate interpretation or a Right Answer - which is the beauty of it. You can talk of validity - i.e. it is *valid* to say that Franny could be pregnant - but not correctness - i.e. Franny is pregnant. Also, we can only ever speculate on how much of anything is autobiographical - which is ultimately irrelevent anyway; like asking `what did da Vinci have for lunch the day he painted the Mona Lisa', because our interpretation is what completes the circle of communication - we are in effect writing the other half of the text. Sure, it's interesting to know biographical things and what inspires artists but it should probably be kept in a seperate basket to literary interpretation and only touched upon rarely. As far as I'm concerned, as soon as it hits the paper, it's fiction. Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442