According to my computerside dictionary which predates me by about three decades : SUB' LIMATE: *v.t* To purify; to heat into vapour and allow to solidify again SUB' LIMATION: *n.* The act of sublimation; in psychoanalysis, an unconscious process by which the repressed energy is directed into ways of cultural and social development. I think both those definitions say a lot really. Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 ---------- > From: Scottie Bowman <bowman@mail.indigo.ie> > To: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu > Subject: more > Date: Friday, 3 July 1998 5:40 > > For most people, `sublimation' is a Freudian term meaning > the conversion of unacceptable impulses into more `civilised', > hopefully more fruitful, expressions. > > For the life of me, I couldn't see what its meaning could be > as used by Will. My simple question was then answered by > citing two more critics who, so far as we are told, may not use > the word at all. > > Matt's question may be laden with wisdom but to me it just > sounded like a rather smartypants put-down. And my response > to it was a plain reiteration of what most people understand as > the difference between art & criticism. That is to say, > the difference between the doing & the commenting upon the doing. > > Will's question about my reading habits sounds as if it were from > the same stable. He must have guessed by now how I regard > the work of professional critics - as purely parasitic. I would > never wish to encourage such unwholesome activities. > > Holden Caulfield was conceived & set going without the slightest > reference to critics & he has thrived without the slightest help > from them - except, perhaps, where their quotes have been used > as aids in marketing. Indeed it's probably only now that he's been > put on the college syllabus & the poor children are required to read > the commentaries that he will start to die. > > Scottie B.