On Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 08:56:35AM -0600, WILL HOCHMAN wrote: > Several months ago I went to hear Richard Ford read at the Tattered Cover. > Afterwards, we got in a discussion of his use of "X" in _The > Sportswriter_. He claims he had totally forgotten it in Esme` but I think > the point of writers using "X" is likely not to be guess who it really is, > but to encourage readers to imagine it could be almost anyone...will ... And sometimes to work as a placeholder for a character in development. I can think of many instances in which I was simultaneously working on the narrative of a story but also seeking just the right name for a character, and many times I fell back on using a letter (e.g., "Z") or a friend's name (hello, Ed!). In fact, it's a fascinating area to consider, because so many times, names have personal connotations for us as writers, and we often can't get around the personal image that is conjured up by a specific name (even if we're the only ones who equate some name association with some trait undesired in the character). There are more than a few intriguing examples if we go look at manuscripts of novels we know and love; Hemingway did it with The Sun Also Rises (though most readers who know the facts observe that the characters were only *thinly* veiled, even with their names changed), and changed the names later, when he had a firmer grip on the story. Ah, names. --tim o'connor