> Very well said, Matt. Your comment that "Shakespeare wrote more things" > really stirred something in me as a reader. Not me. Not me at all. I think that's just so irrelevant! In some ways, I'm kind of glad we only have one novel from Salinger. It's like `Fawlty Towers' - two seasons, each one a tight and perfectly polished gem. Compare that to something like `Roseanne' - started OK, built solidly then disappeared up its own butt into self indulgent twaddle, sticking around for at least two seasons later than it was already DOA. What does the size of the body of work matter ??? `Wuthering Heights' is one of the most brilliant books ever, but it's Emily Bronte's only book. Does that in any way make her a lesser writer than say, William Morris, who produced so much poetry that it fills a whole wall at my university library (some of which has literally never been opened). Nah, nah. We spend enough time discussing the few books he did put out, that's enough for me (not to say that I wouldn't be head of the queue if he brought out a new one). Yours soberly (: Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest