> No comment on the Johnny Depp praise. An Oscar nomination? Anyway, I am > shocked to hear that a writer such as yourself, who feels that the best are > those who "make up their own rules," Not necessarily - I think it's important to be an expert on the rules before you start breaking them, just like Picasso was a consummate realist artist before he moved on to cubism, and Larry from the Three Stooges was a classically trained violin player. No, I've tried to read a lot of those guys - Bukowski, Burroughs ... they just don't do a lot for me. It's like `Natural Born Killers' - it probably looked wonderful and made a lot of sense to someone on an acid bender, but to an ol' soberside like me - blah. Nothing is more boring than watching someone who is stoned out of their brains to someone who isn't - they're dull, they ramble, they go off on boring, pointless tangents. One of the reasons I like Salinger is because he's a great craftsman - he's written some of the best constructed short stories ever, and even something like Catcher which appears to ramble is, on closer inspection, pretty well structured. I prefer it to the later, more boundless things. > "Each new line is a beginning and has nothing to do with any lines which > preceded it. We all start new each time. And, of course, it isn't all that > holy either. The world can live much easier without writing than without > plumbing. And some places in the world have very little of either. Of > course, I'd rather live without plumbing but I'm sick." > --from _The Captain is out to lunch and the sailors have taken over the > ship_ > Anyway. . . would anyone consider the above passage "Salingeresque?" Hmmm .... it does have the colloquial tone of either Catcher or De-Daumier Smith, but ... I dunno. I think it was Will who best summed up Salingeresque - it has a beginning, middle and end - i.e. he's a pretty hard writer to characterise. Just for you I may give Bukowski another go (: Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest