Re: Definition of Natural (gas)

From: Michael J ANELLO <Michael.J.Anello@state.or.us>
Date: Fri Jun 13 2003 - 18:44:33 EDT

that, sir, made my everlovin' day, i presently am trying to catch my breath from laffing!

kee hee hee! farts! How could ontology lay hold of a fart? CLASSIC! I'M BUSTIN A FUCKIN GUT HERE! ha ha ha

i apologize, there are only two things i laff at. homemade jokes and toilet humor. everything else is too serious and thought out.

>>> Omlor@aol.com 06/13/03 03:40PM >>>

Michael,

On farts and the limits of ontology, from one of my very favorite books,
here's another J.D. reading Genet:

"The essence of the rose is its nonessence: its odor insofar as it
evaporates. Whence its effluvial affinity with the fart or the belch: these excrements
do not stay, do not even take form. The remain(s) remain(s) not. Whence its
interest, its lack of interest. How could ontology lay hold of a fart? It can
always put its hand on whatever remains in the john, but never on the whiffs
let out by roses."

Glas, 58bi

All the best,

--John

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Fri Jun 13 18:45:06 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 10 2003 - 22:01:02 EDT