Why make films of Salinger's works at all ? They're singularly unvisual & don't greatly depend for their power on the feel or appearance of the `real world' - which is what film does best. Their essential action isn't even vivid dialogue - which is not Salinger's strong point anyway. They are principally about personality & character (of pretty unusual people at that) & the various internal pilgramages which they undertake. If a cluster of ideas have found their most perfect expression in one medium why try to translate them into another ? It's a bit like reconstructing Chartres Cathedral out of matchsticks or performing the last quartets of Beethoven with a bunch of trombones. Interesting no doubt - but not what the man intended. If the wish is simply to teach one's old classmates a bloody good lesson, as you yourself point out, they won't listen or understand anyway. Scottie B.