Re: Petting Wild Thought on Mars Hill

From: James Rovira <jrovira@drew.edu>
Date: Wed Mar 12 2003 - 14:38:25 EST

Perfectly :). I wasn't arguing against the category of "perfect
rational certainty" absolutely, but only in relationship to our subject
-- language and the interpretation of language.

Again, the denial of "perfect rational certainty" isn't the denial of
all or any certainty.

The hardest thing for people to see is a middle position.

Jim

Yocum Daniel GS 21 CES/CEOE wrote:

>No one's arguing with it as a faith, I think, but with claims for perfect
>rational certainty.
>
>Jim
>
>
>Are you certain?
>
>Daniel
>-
>* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
>* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
>
>
>

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Wed Mar 12 14:38:30 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 10 2003 - 21:58:25 EDT