Perfectly :). I wasn't arguing against the category of "perfect
rational certainty" absolutely, but only in relationship to our subject
-- language and the interpretation of language.
Jim
Yes, but isn't this endeavor a rational endeavor, hence the question yet
again, who sets the boundaries? Perhaps, oh I don't know, but maybe you are
using a noodle as a hammer and end up with the faulty conclusion that it is
in as far as it can go?
Daniel
Again, the denial of "perfect rational certainty" isn't the denial of
all or any certainty.
The hardest thing for people to see is a middle position.
Jim
Your just making work with your half driven nails.
Daniel
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Wed Mar 12 15:53:51 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 10 2003 - 21:58:25 EDT