cubism

Scottie Bowman (bowman@mail.indigo.ie)
Fri, 06 Mar 1998 08:38:51 +0000

	I was very engaged by Mattis's piece on literary cubism.

	It had never occurred to me before that Hemingway's 
	early prose might be seen as a parallel to that movement 
	which was being developed in the visual arts around the same 
	time.  Insofar as they both entail something radical & simplifying 
	I can see that there's something to be said for it.  

	I personally find though that the effects, as far as the reader 
	or viewer is concerned, are quite different.  

	To explode a visual image & reduce it to its component geometric 
	shapes moves it back, to some extent, from what it represents.  
	The viewer sometimes has to make a distinct effort to recognise 
	what he's meant to be seeing & is often left with the feeling of 
	the artist at play, someone horsing around, experimenting.  
	The enjoyment offered is essentially `fun'.

	Hemingway's brilliant early stuff doesn't affect me that way 
	at all.  I don't feel as if I'm being invited to look at things from 
	some intriguing new viewpoint.  It may be a purely personal 
	reaction, 	but I don't have the feeling of Hemingway disintegrating 
	the world & then inviting me to reassemble it.  He does the work 
	all too powerfully *for* his reader.  Nor does his writing have any 
	great quality of `fun'.  It feels, rather, as if he had shaved off 
	one of the layers protecting the nerve endings, leaving the real 
	world to makes its impact in an uncomfortably immediate way.

	On the other hand, Salinger *does* to some extent go in for cubism - 
	as now defined.  Those endlessly modifying clauses & the 
	multifaceted way Buddy presents Seymour, for example, is not 
	unlike a painting by Duchamp or Picasso.  With Salinger more is 
	better, whereas with Hemingway less is more.

	At a purely personal level, I find writers who concern themselves 
	with the recreation of the `real' world more compelling than those 
	whose interests are essentially spiritual or moral.  Which is the 
	reason, I suppose, that Hemingway will always make my heart turn 
	over in a way that Salinger only ever did once - when he created 
	Holden.

	Scottie B.