RE: no laughing, please, I'm an American


Subject: RE: no laughing, please, I'm an American
From: Jive Monkey (monkey_jive@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed May 08 2002 - 20:37:48 EDT


mom?

From: "Micaela" <mbombard@middlebury.edu>
Reply-To: bananafish@roughdraft.org
To: <bananafish@roughdraft.org>
Subject: RE: no laughing, please, I'm an American
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 19:53:12 -0400

dad?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bananafish@roughdraft.org
[mailto:owner-bananafish@roughdraft.org]On Behalf Of Jive Monkey
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 7:33 PM
To: bananafish@roughdraft.org
Subject: Re: no laughing, please, I'm an American

Yes.

I think academic types in general fail to see the joke. My favorite
Salinger story, now that I've gotten over teen angst, is "Raise High the
Roof Beam." May that little man live forever!

But, there is symbolism out there, sometimes. Just not in dad's work.
Seymour and feet? He has a fetish. That red hat? It's a cool hat.

No more symbolism! No more deeper meaning!

Ahem. So, why the hell is there a list at all?

"His standard of comportment for sitting in the rear seat of cars-cars in
motion, cars stationary, and even, one couldn't help imagining, cars that
were driven off bridges into rivers-seemed to be fixed. It was wonderfully
simple. You just sat very erect, maintaining a clearance of four or five
inches between your top hat and the roof, and you stared ferociously ahead
at the windshield. If Death-who was out there all the time, possibly sitting
on the hood-if Death stepped miraculously through the glass and came in
after you, in all probability you just got up and went along with him,
ferociously but quietly. Chances were, you could take your cigar with you,
if it was a clear Havana."

love,
guilty

From: "Robert Bowman" <rbowman@indigo.ie>
Reply-To: bananafish@roughdraft.org
To: <bananafish@roughdraft.org>
Subject: no laughing, please, I'm an American
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 13:04:35 +0100

      Why do Americans find it so hard to see the joke?
      Or is it just Americans who write to listservs?

      I belong to three 'literary' lists - those for Jane Austen,
      Hemingway & Salinger (& also, at one time, Trollope)
      - where the great majority of contributors have been,
      at least from where I'm sitting, Transatlantic.

      Austen wrote highly contrived, romantic stories about
      young women catching husbands - but all of them in
      a wonderfully elegant, satiric style where the humour is
      what raises the whole enterprise from the trivial to the level
      of genius. But on Austen-L all you ever read are endless
      technical discussions of the old English inheritance laws
      or solemn, po-faced agonisings over the deep moral dilemmas
      of her light hearted heroines.

      Same with Hemingway, whose every second line was an ironic
      joke. (He himself once remarked to the effect that though we
      are all growing out of the common earth, the people he cherished
      the most were those where the soil had been liberally fertilised
      with jokes.) But how many laughs on Heming-L? Nary a one.
      Only a grim hunt for symbolic fish or a lot of balls about the tragedy
      of the corrida - or recipes for rum cocktails.

      And what about us here?

      I wonder is the problem that most Yanks come to Salinger during
      their school years? Is it possible that Holden is embraced &
identified
      with by readers who, as adolescents, are at the most intensely
      self-regarding period of their lives - a period when they are least
      capable of laughing at themselves?

      I was almost thirty when I first encountered Holden. I was
      absolutely ravished by the book: by its hilarity, its wildness,
      its irreverence, its freedom. I was remembering how it had
      been for myself fifteen years earlier - &, ruefully, how in many
      ways it still was.
      But it never occurred to me for one moment that this was
      some kind of poignant tragedy about the tender sensitivity
      & evanescence of youth. Which is how it's usually treated
      hereabouts.

      Even when we come to the Glasses (& thank God the Kingdom
      has, in Robbie, at least one other upright man of wisdom)
      although those dreadful caring eyes are beginning to fill with tears,
      there still remains a good deal of the Marx Brothers - from Bessie
      to that marvellous little old bloke with the top hat in the taxi.

      I can't put my finger on it, but in one of the recent pieces about
      Salinger one critic, himself an American, made the point that,
      in 'literature', humour is something Americans have never taken
      seriously. That's certainly how these lists feel to an outsider.
      It's like being back in some Victorian classroom where only
      the worthy, the serious & the edifiying is truly acceptable.

      Scottie B.

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 17:14:12 EDT