no laughing, please, I'm an American


Subject: no laughing, please, I'm an American
From: Robert Bowman (rbowman@indigo.ie)
Date: Wed May 08 2002 - 08:04:35 EDT


    Why do Americans find it so hard to see the joke?
    Or is it just Americans who write to listservs?

    I belong to three 'literary' lists - those for Jane Austen,
    Hemingway & Salinger (& also, at one time, Trollope)
    - where the great majority of contributors have been,
    at least from where I'm sitting, Transatlantic.

    Austen wrote highly contrived, romantic stories about
    young women catching husbands - but all of them in
    a wonderfully elegant, satiric style where the humour is
    what raises the whole enterprise from the trivial to the level
    of genius. But on Austen-L all you ever read are endless
    technical discussions of the old English inheritance laws
    or solemn, po-faced agonisings over the deep moral dilemmas
    of her light hearted heroines.

    Same with Hemingway, whose every second line was an ironic
    joke. (He himself once remarked to the effect that though we
    are all growing out of the common earth, the people he cherished
    the most were those where the soil had been liberally fertilised
    with jokes.) But how many laughs on Heming-L? Nary a one.
    Only a grim hunt for symbolic fish or a lot of balls about the tragedy
    of the corrida - or recipes for rum cocktails.

    And what about us here?

    I wonder is the problem that most Yanks come to Salinger during
    their school years? Is it possible that Holden is embraced & identified
    with by readers who, as adolescents, are at the most intensely
    self-regarding period of their lives - a period when they are least
    capable of laughing at themselves?

    I was almost thirty when I first encountered Holden. I was
    absolutely ravished by the book: by its hilarity, its wildness,
    its irreverence, its freedom. I was remembering how it had
    been for myself fifteen years earlier - &, ruefully, how in many
    ways it still was.
    But it never occurred to me for one moment that this was
    some kind of poignant tragedy about the tender sensitivity
    & evanescence of youth. Which is how it's usually treated
    hereabouts.

    Even when we come to the Glasses (& thank God the Kingdom
    has, in Robbie, at least one other upright man of wisdom)
    although those dreadful caring eyes are beginning to fill with tears,
    there still remains a good deal of the Marx Brothers - from Bessie
    to that marvellous little old bloke with the top hat in the taxi.

    I can't put my finger on it, but in one of the recent pieces about
    Salinger one critic, himself an American, made the point that,
    in 'literature', humour is something Americans have never taken
    seriously. That's certainly how these lists feel to an outsider.
    It's like being back in some Victorian classroom where only
    the worthy, the serious & the edifiying is truly acceptable.

    Scottie B.

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 17:14:12 EDT