Re: Theory

heh.

You have a point. I know it. I think robbie brought up a few points that
weren't passed around the last few times theory came up, though. Nothing
that hasn't been said before, but at least some things that weren't said on
the list before. Perhaps my memory fails me.

Maybe we could create a website with standard responses and counter
responses? Then number them. Future theory discussions would then be
along the lines of, "I'd like to refer to you to Q and A no. 351." "Au
contraire, what about Q and A 246?"

Jim

PS Scottie -- Trust Me, reading lists wouldn't have come up if someone
hadn't _asked_ for them. And anything deserving of the label "exquisite,"
even a sensitivity, is surely worthy of a bit of listserv space, eh?

Matt Kozusko wrote:

> Perhaps in the future, we can save time, tears, and tempers by simply
> cutting and pasting whole chunks of list archive into the traffic. Or
> we could create a little list theory dungeon-library combo, and anyone
> who mentions theory would have to go into the dungeon for some time and
> sit amongst the old posts and ponder whether it's really worth it to
> make everyone say the same crap all over again.
>
> --
> Il n'y a pas de hors texte,
>
> Matt
> -
> * Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
> * UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Sun Nov 3 17:10:13 2002