Re: Theory

From: Jim Rovira <jrovira@drew.edu>
Date: Mon Nov 04 2002 - 10:41:17 EST

That'd be great Scottie --

So the conversations would go:

169.
231.
257!
178b.

We could probably assign stock insults by number too:

69.
88.
. . .

Jim

Scottie Bowman wrote:

> '... Future theory discussions would then be along
> the lines of, 'I'd like to refer to you to Q and A no. 351.'..'
>
> This brilliant modification of the old VNCEP (Vaudevillian's
> Numeric Codified Exchange Protocol) originally devised for
> the professional swopping of jokes could be further refined
> by omitting all that introductory 'I'd like to refer you...' stuff.
> A plain number would suffice - in this way obviating unnecessary
> typing & removing at a stroke the opportunity for
> hostility-by-lower-case.
>
> Scottie B.
>
> -
> * Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
> * UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Mon Nov 4 10:41:19 2002

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 10 2003 - 21:52:10 EDT