Pasha enlightned us with (among other things, of course): > ... In the summer school class I co-taught this past summer we > conceived a generalized notion of "catchers" based on Holden's dream in > TCIR. A "catcher" in a Salinger story would be any character who to some > extent saves/reawakens/restores/begins the protagonist's progress towards > spiritual enlightenment. We termed this enlightenment "innocence" > (sometimes with a capital I) and thus the protagonist as the "innocent" > of the story. > > Our reading of "Eskimos" was that Ginnie was the troubled innocent, who > walked a thin line between childish honesty (preferred) and adult > phoniness (itself a subject of some debate). Paul put his finger on our > reading of Franklin's character: as his name might suggest, he is absolutely > sincere -- "frank" -- with everyone, especially Ginnie. Franklin is the > catcher for this story, in that his undying honesty and near childishness > has the same strangely comforting, strangely awakening influence on Ginnie > that Esme's and Charles's have on X. Further, Ginnie sees Franklin's > charitable gesture as an act of innocence, not unlike Esme's donation of her > father's watch or Phoebe packing up her belongings and trying to catch up > to Holden. Taken together, these points would explain the reference to the > Easter chick: Ginnie sees both Franklin's gift and the dead Easter chick as > reminders of purity of innocence. Maybe not in such overdeveloped terms, > but still... Dear Pasha, Thank you very much for this rosetta stone. It resonates with reason, insight, and the sound of one hand clapping. all the best, Mattis