Like I've said MANY times before ... the ideal scholar is the one who can balance emotion with intellect. I think that's why I'm so fond of the metaphysical poets. I always resent people who turn everything into a theory (the tutor who returned my essay with a lousy mark and the comment `Your opinion is never a substitute for serious engagement with literary theory' is foremost in my mind here') But that's not to say literary theory can't be helpful. Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest > Those who only think don't really understand those who feel. Those who > only feel--like Scottie--don't understand those who think (but think they > do :) ). Those who do both, well, tend to be confused half the time... > I read Joyce's Portrait, and Felt, and then I did my senior honors thesis > on it, and never wanted to read another word of Joyce again :) So the > danger's there. > I know your question was directed toward Will, but somehow I think he's > managed to avoid the danger. If you choose to remain an English major > you're going to have to face this and overcome it somehow.