Camille Scaysbrook wrote, of _Hamlet_, Q1: > Ahh ... now this is my area of expertise. I'm working on a radio show about > this very subject. It's now been agreed that these were actually earlier > drafts. Who has conducted this agreeing? Scholars have indeed refused to believe various logical things from time to time, but stubbornness and the tradition aren't the only reasons. Surely you will not suggest that the origin of Q1 and its relationship to Q2 and F1 has been found beyond a doubt out once and for all. -- Matt Kozusko mkozusko@parallel.park.uga.edu