Re: Shakespeare
Erin McLaughlin (erinseyes@hotmail.com)
Mon, 09 Nov 1998 08:25:34 -0800 (PST)
Well, for my part, I'm pretty sure most of us on this mailing list know
how to read. Some of us can even type. And I can usually spell, but not
necessarily while typing. Go figure.
----Original Message Follows----
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 15:12:35 -0700
From: Paul VanDenBerghe <VanDenBergheP@ldschurch.org>
Subject: Re: Shakespeare
To: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu
Reply-to: bananafish@lists.nyu.edu
>>>>
Yeah, this is a pretty good example of someone not really knowing how to
read, and holding it against someone who does. . . .
. . Of course, if you think ignorance is a virtue, that's fine. Just =
don't
hold it against those who Know better...
In short, Fuck Off
Jim =20
>>>>
I was not specifically satirizing your comments about the Shylock =
character or about the other ideas you posted. My thoughts were intended
=
to raise the point and highlight the quandary that much of our
"historical"=
information is quite speculative and uncertain.
Then again, my inability to read--especially when confronted by someone
=
who "Know[s] better" and can articulate a retort with such
eloquence--sets =
me back in awe. And I must concede how wrong I was.
In short, Thank You.
Paul
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com