Re: Shakespeare

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: WILL HOCHMAN: "Re: Barkleys of Broadway"
• Previous message: Drnick19@aol.com: "laughing man"
• Maybe in reply to: Matt Kozusko: "Shakespeare"
• Next in thread: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: Shakespeare"

Camille directs me to Eric Sams's book, for which I thank her.  But
"it's now been agreed" hinted at something bigger--a concurrence at some
sort of ecumenical council.  If I stroll into this year's Shakespeare
conference in San Francisco and slap Gary Taylor on the behind, will he
greet me with, "Ah, Matt!  Have you heard?"?  Will I see Brian Vickers
and Terry Eagleton, differences finally resolved in the meager but
healing leaves of Q1, chatting cheerily over a pint and a cigar?

In the end, I myself like the Q1-as-draft theory best.  But nothing in
Shakespeare studies is simple.  

-- 
Matt Kozusko    mkozusko@parallel.park.uga.edu

• Next message: WILL HOCHMAN: "Re: Barkleys of Broadway"
• Previous message: Drnick19@aol.com: "laughing man"
• Maybe in reply to: Matt Kozusko: "Shakespeare"
• Next in thread: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: Shakespeare"