We're told Salinger as a young writer was an admirer of Hemingway. And certainly the Catcher & Esme have something of the tone of the older man's colloquially told stories. But by the time we get to the later stuff with all those dandyish associations & qualifications he seems to ignore completely the principle of 'less is more.' (To me that 'academical' frown of Zooey's sounds like the kind of thing one tosses in for easy effect & later cuts as being altogether too charmingly glib.) A writer must go on finding his own voice & be honest to it &, of course, one respects him for it. But the reason he loses me by the time we get into the Glass menagerie has as much to do with the way he trowels on the words as with the Gosh-isn't-this-mystical-&-ineffable philosophising. Scottie B.