Morgan, I like the idea of b-fishers identifying their occupations or school status. Salinger attracts an eclectic group. Age, ethnicity, and native land might be enlightening too. i'm not trying to run a "personals" here! --i do think that our probable diversity only instensifies an awareness of the broad cult status of jds. i'll go first-- instructor at state university--thirteen years 30 something ( i didn't say you had to be specific!) east texas ( i find myself wanting to say "east coast" or "midwest"--i do not own boots, a stetson, or a pair of wranglers!) whose next? again, i'm new so i don't want any of you to repeat yourselves, but i would like to know what initiated your interest in Salinger. i didn't read catcher in class--i read it poolside when i was young and tan and looking for a short read. At 25, i was still too young to appreciate it properly. I reread it at 30 and have used it as a text for freshman comp for five years (ha! i just gave away my age :)). i read franny and zooey for the first time last month. i don't know what took me so long to get to it. i guess i didn't want to set myself up for seeing it as a poor repackaging of catcher. and at first that is exactly what i thought, but like so many of salinger's stories, f & z has haunted me --I am beginning to respect their religious odysseys as equally provoking studies of what sylvia plath called "a weird abundance of emotion" the kind of abundance that can paralyze (as it does franny on the couch and holden in the city) or that can even bring death (as it does to plath and to her friend ann sexton).But it can also bring the gift of the truth--and some of us are willing to accept that curse of abundance in exchange for some fragment of enlightenment. -- M.E. Pierce Dept. of English/ SFASU http://titan.sfasu.edu/~f_pierceme "and gladly would he lerne, and gladly teche." Chaucer