anonymous wrote: > > I understand completely, but what I see is that people take J.D. and > they make him godlike and then they take hi works and make them the holy > scriptures. Then they separate his woks from him. Then they separate > the godlike Salinger and Salinger the man. I agree with you in some extend... He´s not a God, we all know that, but the separation of man and work is done by himself I´d say... He was never interested in telling about himself, so except for a few things we don´t know how much of the man is actually in his work... Abra