Re: Seymour's Death -- "Et tu, Muriel?"

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: helena kim: "Re: jd is just an author"
• Previous message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: jd is just an author"
• Maybe in reply to: Pasha Paterson: "Seymour's Death -- "Et tu, Muriel?""
• Next in thread: helena kim: "Re: Seymour's Death -- "Et tu, Muriel?""

Yes. Thankyou, *thankyou* Jim. I was finding it oddly self-defeating to
wonder why a story built on the premise of mystery was so mysterious (:

> I think your point that we NEED the rest of the canon to understand the
> story is the best point of all.  And that we need the story to understand
> the rest of the canon as well.  I think we're left in the same position
> as the rest of the Glass family by Seymour's suicide--baffled, and trying
> to work it out for the rest of our lives.  
> 
> I think that's the point.  
> 
> Jim

Camille
verona_beach@geocities.com
@ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442
@ THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest

• Next message: helena kim: "Re: jd is just an author"
• Previous message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: jd is just an author"
• Maybe in reply to: Pasha Paterson: "Seymour's Death -- "Et tu, Muriel?""
• Next in thread: helena kim: "Re: Seymour's Death -- "Et tu, Muriel?""