Scottie Bowman wrote: > Surely the whole point of the Ern Malley episode was that > the critics who projected meanings onto the poems were seen > to be the idiots. And, unless I'm mistaken, that was the joker's > 'intention' in the first place. At a basic level, yes. It gave everyone a good kick in the pants re. over intellectualising. But it is important to remember that the two jokers in question were actually two scholars of high repute, not a couple of teenage shit-stirrers or anything. I see it more as an experiment with meaning than a joke, just as the Sokal episode can be looked upon. > They were fundamentally the same kind of idiots who hail > computer generated pictures or the daubs of chimpanzees > as works of art. A landscape or a piquant human face may > arouse all kinds of emotions but they cannot be regarded > as pieces of art until an individual human mind has deliberately > worked to transform them into something else altogether. That's an interesting opinion. So art is a wholly human-based activity? I suppose it is. But how are we to know? How do we know that a bird making its nest isn't creating a functional art object. A friend of mine has a book about cats making art - that is, being given paint and paper and choosing which colours and which shapes to put on the paper. The art theory student in me said `Hmm. Maybe there's something in this'. But the cynic in me just admitted it was a load of bollocks when I came to a picture of a dead mouse in someone's hallway described as a `nocturnal installation' (: > That intended outcome by one man or woman is what > qualifies it to be even considered as an art work. I think that that's taking a rather broad view of things. Why isn't a theatre production or a movie a collaborative creation? How can it be anything but? In both cases, the director, writer, actors, set designers, costume designers, sound designers and so on all combine to create a piece of art together. Got to go now, Mittens has just dragged in a Jackson Pollock (: Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest