On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Emily Friedman wrote: > I forced myself not to say anything before, but I really do agree with > Matt. Anyone who has read the book could answer those questions in a > minute. Matt: I like the way you described those black and yellow > books. I hate those books. They are totally against my principles. not meaning to start an argument. i thought matt apologised for his post... totally against your principles? as the person who herself said she olny reads great literature, have you never been stuck on a really big book? have you never come to an impasse on your thoughts and needed something to prod you along? and if you haven't, can you understand what it would be like for someone else who has? don't you think that this smacks of self-righteousness? don't you think that it is only good and fair for people who *aren't* in advanced englich classes, people who would never read books unless it were for school to have a lil bit of something to guide them along? i know i never would have finished reading king lear without having an annotated copy and study notes. it didn't stop me from making up my own mind, it just helped me see what other people had seen in it, and then make up my own views. (also, i'm well aware that this fully contradicts anything i may have said recently about the use of green day and other musicians in english classes. whoever said opinions were constant? :)) :helena kim helena at netsoc dot tcd dot ie 'the church is near, but the road is icy. the bar is far, but i will walk carefully.' - russian proverb