Re: introduction.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: MunkerJ@aol.com: "Re: introduction."
• Previous message: Scottie Bowman: "Re: introduction."
• Maybe in reply to: MunkerJ@aol.com: "introduction."
• Next in thread: MunkerJ@aol.com: "Re: introduction."

In a message dated 11/25/99 4:21:40 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
rbowman@indigo.ie writes:

>     '... some of our members are not fond of epiphanies ...'
>  
>      Well, Timothy O'Connor, I certainly hope it wasn't 
>      ME you had in mind.  And I furthermore hope it 
>      wasn't ME you expected to attack this newcomer 
>      to our friendly ranks.
>  
>      Especially someone like Jessica whose story rang 
>      with the clear, unmistakable note of a crystal glass 
>      when you touch it gently with your spoon.
>  
>      Scottie B.

Yeah, I don't ever recall you complaining about "epiphanies" in themselves, 
but about my use of the word "epiphany."

Welcome to bananaworld, Jessica :)

Jim  

• Next message: MunkerJ@aol.com: "Re: introduction."
• Previous message: Scottie Bowman: "Re: introduction."
• Maybe in reply to: MunkerJ@aol.com: "introduction."
• Next in thread: MunkerJ@aol.com: "Re: introduction."