Re: Muriel

AntiUtopia@aol.com
Sun, 28 Nov 1999 16:50:52 -0500 (EST)

In a message dated 11/28/99 3:43:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
lp9616@bristol.ac.uk writes:

> Of course if you love Seymour and despise Muriel she is being sold 
>  short. 

eh, this is a bit of a non-sequitur.  I would only think Muriel is being 
"sold short" if I, in fact, liked her (which I do), and if I think she's not 
being given enough credit (which I didn't think Tim's post did).  I mean, I 
actually said she "understood" Seymour, possibly, in ways others (even his 
own family) didn't.

How God Awful Annoying :)  

Let's not forget, he married her. Not out of despair, either. 
>  There is a wonderful passage from his diary in RHRBC where he speaks of 
>  WHY he loves Muriel, about how she wants to go to the hotel lobby and 
>  ask if her husband has picked up the mail, and how he feels that she 
>  and her mother fill his pockets with endless invisible cosmetics, for 
>  which he feels immensely grateful but which he doesn't know what to do 
>  with. I think it's important to remember the overwhelming tenderness 
>  with which that diary is written when reading "Bananafish". Muriel 
>  isn't perfect. Maybe she's not one of the Seymours or Frannys or 
>  Zooeys. But how many of us are?
>  
>  Thanks, Tim, for bringing up a genuinely interesting topic.
>  
>  Love, Lucy-Ruth
>  ----------------------

Good points made to the wrong person.  

Jim