On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Scottie Bowman wrote: > > Well, Jessica, didn't I warn you? Didn't I? > There's no tyranny quite like the tyranny of > the tender. Scottie, I find this really funny. I always feel like I'm playing a game of rock-paper-scissors with people. They are make a stupid judgement call and I trump them with Rationality then they trump me with Tenderness. Unfortunately, many of our culture have adopted the stance that feelings are unassailable. And while I make the argument that having a feeling is an unquestionable right, acting on it is a completely different matter. Many people don't seem to feel that way, as if all responsibility for good judgement is thrown out the window if you're upset. It's tiring. While pure rationality is also not the way to go, a tempered soul has a much more successful time living. How can we have forgotten Plato? How can someone figure something out over 2000 years ago, and we still haven't got it? The tyranny of the tender -- yes. Let's all just talk, express our minds and never succumb to frivilous hyper-sensitivity. I hate walking on conversational egg shells. If you like eating tubers and I have a problem with tubers or I disappove of tuber lovers, what the heck do you care? We can have a dialog where you tell me why tubers are better than legumes and why you can't do without them, and I'll listen, and maybe I'll go out and try a tuber, but if I still don't like it . . . so what? And don't give me that cockimaney bull-plop about sensitivity. I've made it to sensitivity training several times and they couldn't hold me. The only people who really demand sensitivity are soldier of war and God damn it, they don't want any of that crap. So, all of you tender hearts out there, tender heads, lay down the censorship of the weak heart. Eat some jalapenos and fresh horseradish and grow some hair on that chest. -j it's monday and I'm not in the mood for any of that hypersensitive conversational hypocondriac crap.