Re: Re: Wind in the Willows


Subject: Re: Re: Wind in the Willows
ZazieZazie@hetnet.nl
Date: Wed Oct 10 2001 - 20:48:49 GMT


Whoa!! And this from a 'scholar' who keeps on blaming me for not discussing content of
some essay (HIS essay, I add).

So let me get this straight:
for jim it's not okay to get criticism on the style of his essay, he then immediately
blames me for not understanding it, as if that had got any to do with, but it's okay for
for him to disrespect a book or something said about a book HE HASN'T EVEN READ!?!?!
At least I criticise what i've read, i advise him to do the same.
He just lost all credit i might have given him.

At 10/10/01 10:45:00, jim r. wrote:
>I'll have to read the book, but my first response to statements like this
>is: "What a bunch of hooey."
>
>"And that's when Tonstance Weader fwowed up..."
>
>Jim
>
>Paul Miller wrote:
>>
>> This from Milne on Wind in the Willows is priceless.
>>
>> "One does not argue about The Wind in the Willows. The young man gives it to
>> the girl with whom he is in love, and, if she does not like it, asks her to
>> return his letters. The older man tries it on his nephew, and alters his
>> will accordingly. The book is a test of character. We can't criticize it,
>> because it is criticizing us. But I must give you one word of warning. When
>> you sit down to it, don't be so ridiculous as to suppose that you are
>> sitting in judgment on my taste, or on the art of Kenneth Grahame. You are
>> merely sitting in judgment on yourself. You may be worthy: I don't know, But
>> it is you who are on trial."
>>
>> A. A. Milne
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> -
>> * Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
>> * UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
>-
>* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
>* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
>

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Nov 12 2001 - 17:22:39 GMT