RE: however, this is a tragic situation

"they aren't intent on capturing American political power and enforcing their
vision of a new society on the world."

John O: how is this reconciled with the conclusion that "most humanities people are just people?"

luke

ps, Daniel's grammar looks good to me

-----Original Message-----
From: Yocum Daniel GS 21 CES/CEOE <daniel.yocum@Peterson.af.mil>
Sent: Sep 30, 2003 4:16 PM
To: "'bananafish@roughdraft.org'" <bananafish@roughdraft.org>
Subject: RE: however, this is a tragic situation

I guess you don't see what I am saying fine. I never said that humanities
people are a secret evil cabal with evil plans by they do have biases that
they deny, like you are denying now. Deny away. I will retire back to the
peanut gallery for now. I am sorry that you think this conversation is too
stupid for you, fine, I am not the only one that sees this denial as a
problem, so I guess this will be fought out in public with legislators, the
executive branch, and the bench.
Daniel

See, you seem to forget that most humanities people are just people -- like
you. They're not part of this secret evil cabal designed to brainwash your
kids; they don't live every minute to see their evil plans realized; they
aren't intent on capturing American political power and enforcing their
vision of a new society on the world.

I'm sorry Daniel, but this conversation is getting too freaking stupid to
continue. I never even implied that "I" would be the one to decide this. I
specifically said that -most people- just aren't interested -- that -they-
decide all on their own they're not interested. This type of reading error
proceeds specifically from your paranoia.
There are no "hidden" assumptions. I laid them out for you. Try reading.
Jim
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH
Received on Wed Oct 1 03:47:03 2003