amen tim--since we've been sensitive to even analyzing stories on this list, chain letters and non-jds stuff can be pretty vulgar despite the good intentions in them...will On Sat, 11 Oct 1997, Tim O'Connor wrote: > At 08:19 PM 10/10/97 -0700, you wrote: > > >Hey guys, this is something a friend sent me. I know this doesn't have to > >do with J.D. but I thought it was important. Please read it. > > I don't know how to say this without sounding terribly insensitive, but > please don't send chain mail to this list. I don't think there are many > lists that would want it, because it can be tremendously disruptive, > especially if people who receive it send replies to all recipients, who > then may send replies to all recipients, and so on until what we have is a > very big snowball at the bottom of a very steep hill. > > I say this realizing that some of us will object to what I say, in the > interests of being concerned about the victim, if this is a true story. > (Most are not; most are the electronic equivalent of urban legends.) But > regardless of that, if anyone here wants to engage in a campaign, the most > effective way to do it is to deal with individual mail addresses, and not > by sending copies to mailing lists. > > Regards to everyone.... > > --tim o'connor >