but the thing of it is that catcher doesn't need banning to "stick around"--it's a book that will be read for centuries because of much more than negative idiocy...will On Sun, 26 Oct 1997, Kathy Dexter wrote: > it seems that any book that gets widely banned sticks around for quite > awhile. so maybe catcher will be around as long as tom sawyer... > also, one of my english profs made mention to a story that jd wrote last > year or about that time and said it was about a sailor. anyone know > anything more? > finally cool enough to wear flannel in waco, tx.--matt > > > On Sun, 26 Oct 1997 09:55:07 -0800 sgallagher@lasersedge.net (Steve > Gallagher) wrote: > > >Revistied this quote this morning; made me think of JDS: "Whoever comes > >to > >the gates of literature without the Muses' madness, believing that > >technique alone will make him an adequate writer, is himself > >ineffectual, > >and the writing of this sane man vanishes before that of the man who is > >mad." PLATO, *Phaedrus* > > > >Just how long is CITR going to be around? How soon will reprints > >require > >footnotes? Is JD ever goning to snap out of it? Beautiful morning to > >wonder. Leaves and rain falling fast in Vancouver. > >