> I am also uncertain what rhetorical purpose is served by juxtaposing this: > > > > We are the literary representatives of Ayn Rand. Please be advised that > > > discussion of Ayn Rand is expressly forbidden on this list, which is > > with this: > > > > `... Sorry, but you're not really in a position to judge > > > the motives people have for holding to certain beliefs unless > > > you share those beliefs yourself. I mean, couldn't your criticism > > > here be viewed as a bit smug and self-righteous? ...' It's just a matter of censorship is what I meant. Just what I said - that there's no sense in diverting people from their beliefs, be they in religion *or* in Ayn Rand. No matter what you meant by that post the semiotics of it were flashing CENSORSHIP in big red letters. Camille verona_beach@geocities.com @ THE ARTS HOLE www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442 @ THE INVERTED FOREST www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest