Re: van't to be alone


Subject: Re: van't to be alone
From: citycabn (citycabn@gateway.net)
Date: Tue Sep 05 2000 - 12:31:38 GMT


will wrote:

>Seemingly strong proof in _Dream Catcher_ that Salinger has been
>writing a good deal of Seymour's life and other texts. I'm going to
>write the review tomorrow--

I haven't looked for _Dream Catcher_ as yet out here on the west coast. But
I must say will's posts have me anticipating the book with more than tabloid
(or Poison Dwarf, to use Scottie's excellent phrase) interest. will, I hope
it is possible for you eventually to post your review.

I have read those newspaper links. I must say I got a laugh when Margaret
S. said that there were photos in the book because "he didn't take them."
(And I guess hence wouldn't own the 'expressive heart' of them.)

I think we need to remember when reading Scottie's statements regarding the
nature of the creative psyche that he himself was a distinguishly published
novelist in the 1960s and is currently penning even better work.

If I am not mistaken, drinking one's urine is a part of certain health
regimens and yogic practices. (I personally opt for Twining's Irish
Breakfast.)

--Bruce

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 14:44:36 GMT