Re: van't to be alone

Subject: Re: van't to be alone
From: citycabn (citycabn@gateway.net)
Date: Wed Sep 06 2000 - 13:26:19 GMT

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Scottie Bowman: "second opinion"
• Previous message: Cecilia Baader: "Re: Holy Fools, Batman."
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "van't to be alone"
• Next in thread: Will Hochman: "Re: van't to be alone"
• Maybe reply: citycabn: "Re: van't to be alone"

will's positive posts have more than convinced me that _Dream Catcher_ is a
must read.

While I wait here out west for the wagon train to finally arrive with the
book, I wanted to ask,

will, would you amplify:

>Seemingly strong proof in _Dream Catcher_ that Salinger has been
>writing a good deal of Seymour's life and other texts

--Bruce

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH

• Next message: Scottie Bowman: "second opinion"
• Previous message: Cecilia Baader: "Re: Holy Fools, Batman."
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "van't to be alone"
• Next in thread: Will Hochman: "Re: van't to be alone"
• Maybe reply: citycabn: "Re: van't to be alone"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 14:44:36 GMT