a corrective from Yasna Polyana


Subject: a corrective from Yasna Polyana
From: Scottie Bowman (rbowman@indigo.ie)
Date: Sat Sep 16 2000 - 07:38:01 GMT


    Many thanks to Scout for finding us this civilised
    & satisfying interview. Margaret Salinger came across
    - to my no very great surprise - as cool, intelligent
    & sympathetic. And she was well served by an interviewer
    who sounded both reasonable & informed.

    Whilst he declared himself frankly 'for' her father, time
    & again I could hear my own reponses chiming in sympathy
    with hers - even before she had uttered them. Whether
    listening to her partiality for the 'Esme' story or her scorn
    for the marble heads who scutter round 'protecting' the privacy
    of the old eejit - I could only give a soft cheer.

    I could also understand the daughter of such a humourless,
    self-infatuated clown advocating celibacy for certain types
    of person.

    But any comparison with Tolstoy is, of course, absurd.
    As someone has pointed out, when all those thousands
    turned out for his funeral, rather few had even heard
    of War & Peace or Anna Karenina or The Cossacks or
    Resurrection or.... For them, he was the great, holy,
    crackpot Count Lev who organised food centres for
    the starving, worked alongside his own peasants, & had
    often been threatened with banishment for his battles
    against the established injustices of the state. And the rest.
    A man profoundly engaged in the world - all his life.
    Can you imagine? The greatest literary genius of
    the past hundred years (& he was just as compulsive
    as any writer) yet he often saw his books as unworthy
    interruptions of his proper work for his fellow creatures.
    What he did NOT do was retire to some cabin on one
    of his estates to study his umbilicus & whittle exquisite
    little studies of effete Muscovites.

    He remained married to the same woman for fifty years,
    a woman who bore him nine children & transcribed &
    typed as many as four or five versions of his great books.
    They fought like cats - often over situations of sexual
    jealousy which they both suffered into their seventies.
    (The children, I may say, remembered their father as
    vividly for his fun & teasing, affectionate warmth as for
    his crazy obsessions. And none of them wrote War &
    Families or Life with Father.)
     
    Leo was a mensch. For Chrissake. Don't talk me about
    Salinger.

    As for all those unpublished masterpieces. The long-awaited
    opus is a recurrent phenomenon - especially in the world of
    American letters. Most recently, who was it? - Brodky? I'm old
    enough to remember how, after 1941, we kept being promised
    great & unimaginable wonders from the desk of Ernest Hemingway.
    It was all going to be about '.... the sea & the earth & the air...'
    & God knows what. And after twenty years, look what we got:
    one short, (OK, terrific) book of malicious memoirs, one failed
    war-novel, one labouredly pretentious fable - & a great load of
    embarrassing dross.

    Don't hold your breath, chaps.

    Scottie B.

-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sun Oct 01 2000 - 14:44:36 GMT