WILL HOCHMAN wrote: > actually, I don't dig royalty and do dig marxism, but when I look at > individuals, Di had a lot going for her that I could respect and > appreciate...she tried to help others--does anyone do that enough? will That's the personal irony for me of her death. I've always been a punk and communist at heart myself, even though my family, particularly my mother and sister who even organized a slumber party with other Brits for the wedding 16 years ago so they could get up and watch it live in the wee small hours of the morning, have always followed the royals and I've never given them a toss meself. But when the marriage started to fall apart I could sense that she was in an unbearable amount of pain and had no support from the royal family whatsoever. I remember watching Diana's BBC interview a couple of years ago and my opinion of her soared after the interview was over. I didn't really understand the full extent of her depth and sensitivity and warmth and compassion until I saw that interview. It had me in tears, really. It's incredible and very inspiring. And after all is said and done, it's not one's position in life that really has any bearing on one's soul: it's what you do with that position. I'd personally rather hang out with a wealthy ex-royal who used her fame to advance noteworthy causes than any whinging selfish rad slacker dudette any day of the week. I mean, how can you consider yourself an enlightened person if you let the appearances of such trappings as fame and wealth interfere with one's ability to be able to recognize a true thoroughbred? Well I just happened to find the complete transcript online. It will more than likely be repeated on TV before the month's up, but if not, here's the link. http://scoop.evansville.net/diana.html Malcolm