Re: the literary life
WILL HOCHMAN (hochman@uscolo.edu)
Wed, 23 Sep 1998 07:32:52 -0600 (MDT)
Yes Camille, that's what I've been saying...plus I don't understand why we
should expect Mr. Salinger to be wonderful or even typical...I don't want
to be under the type of microscope he's been under, and even Socttie who I
admire might not survive such close scrutiny without his fine image
tarnishing a bit...
I have to admit I enjoyed Salinger in Maynard's book because she brings
him to life on the page...like I enjoyed meeting him in WP Kinsella's
_Shoeless Joe_. But I think both instances of Salinger on the page are
fiction and judging him as a person is simply not something I want to
do...
will
On Wed, 23 Sep 1998, Camille Scaysbrook wrote:
>
> > I have no way of knowing how true is her description of his rage
> > at her impending publication.
>
> Of *course* he's angry. He's no longer a mystery man. We have penetrated
> the ivory tower and we've found no Gentleman of Shalott but an eccentric
> but essentially - or maybe the word should be `believable' - guy.
>
> I found the Maynard book at my local esoteric bookstore today - I was very
> surprised, I didn't know it was out here yet and haven't seen any reviews.
> I only had a chance to flick through it but found a pretty amusing story
> about Salinger trying to smoke a salmon by sticking it down his chimney. (:
>
> > But I suspect - on past form - if her
> > report were really contestable he would already have contested it.
>
> But what could he contest? Like she said, it's her recollections, and
> there's no way of copyrighting those, short of lobotomy.
>
> Camille
> verona_beach@geocities.com
> @ THE ARTS HOLE
> www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Theater/6442
> THE INVERTED FOREST
> www.angelfire.com/pa/invertedforest
>
>
>