Re: Teddy = parts of Seymour ?

William Hochman (wh14@is9.nyu.edu)
Sun, 19 Sep 1999 13:07:57 -0400 (EDT)

On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Camille Scaysbrook wrote:

> 
> As an author it's a very sneaky way for JDS to discredit his earlier story
> and effectively remove it from the Glass canon as unsatisfactory. Just as
> sneaky as giving the rights to Seymour's brilliant haikus to Muriel so we
> can never read any (:
> 
> Camille
> verona_beach@hotpop.com

If I were to speculate on why S gave M the haikus, I'd guess for love.
Too bad Rilke didn't do it for her...will