Someone wrote: > '...The book I think should most bear a warning label would > be JD Salinger's _A Catcher in the Rye_. I read this for > the first time when I was twelve and I thought Holden Caulfield > was a prat. As this is the favourite novel of so many of my > friends, I read it at least four more times over the years and > my opinion has changed: I later thought him a git and now > I believe him to be a wanker. This character is worse than > Fanny Price [of Mansfiedl Park] in his holy innoscence and > wisdom act, at least Fanny WONDERS if she could possibly > be acting wrongly and Holden never does...' Anyone who judges the book by judging Holden's attitude is missing the = point, and probably always will. Holden is not someone to admire or look to for guidance. We love him because we can look at him and appreciate his = human-ness. We can look at him and say, "There is someone who is just as confused as I = once was" or, "...am." Franny's probably more mature, but Holden inhabits the superior novel. What do the following words mean anyway?: prat, git, wanker