"...all legitimate religious study must lead to unlearning the differences, the illusory differences, between boys and girls, animals and stones, day and night, heat and cold." Thanks Will...... Perhaps in an attempt to delve into the current thread without properly reading all posts, I have missed the real meat of the issue ipso facto, but has identifying with character and all or any of his or her feelings really become the intent of reading literature, or the basis upon which one assesses his or her fulfillment? While I would offer the notion that perhaps some "quasi-universal (Ahhh!!!)", or at least common experiences or emotions might lend themselves to further enjoyment, or proximity to the central characters etc, I can't imagine trying to "relate" neccessarily to all of them - but isn' t that the point of actively learning as one reads - to place oneself in a panopticon of sorts? I can't imagine how droll my literary experiences would be if I related to all of the characters I enjoy or have enjoyed - or even not enjoyed(!). Occasionally, reading is, to me as I have learned, a masochistic process with infinite yields. Perhaps we need to stop spoon feeding ourselves and others the pastries with the familiar fillings, and try something less pleasing - or at least less familiar - to the old palate. (Like Sommerset Maughm, yuk yuk) Dan