Jim wrote: > But, at any rate, the fact that we do, to some degree, make a distinction > between people and ideas is a step in the right direction. And yep, it's > essentially a Christian value judgment. Again, I draw on the example of D.W. Griffith's `Birth of a Nation' - revolutionary artistically, pretty bloody dodgy ideologically. When I studied it at University it was the first time I had ever considered the idea of the two things needing to be separated and appreciated (or otherwise) separately. It's a very difficult area. It would be a very, very hard thing, for example, to like the writing style of Mein Kampf while being in total opposition to Hitler's ideas. I'm of two (or more) minds about it myself, Postmodernist that I am I think in the end I believe the writer is part and parcel of the big old package of Book and Experience we call a Text. We'd have a pretty different reaction to Shakespeare if we knew he was a woman. Or a Nazi. Yours with another cup of Ginseng tea, Camille verona_beach@geocities.com _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com