Re: advice to Camille

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: I beg to differ than that..."
• Previous message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: lowercase will is back not to basics"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "advice to Camille"
• Next in thread: Paul Kennedy: "Re: advice to Camille"

Scottie wrote:

>     You're too young for all that but in light of your present
>     environment may I suggest a façade of extreme Anglified primness
>     & correctness?  This will discourage rival sisters, present a
challenge
>     to the rough trade from the outback & make you the obvious
>     recipient for the confidences of strangers - a commodity so valuable,
>     as we all know, for any writer.

Well, at the moment, after trying calculated weirdness, non-calculated
weirdness, a brief flirtation with Gothic and a rather longer one with
anonymoty I am currently toying with 1930s glamour queen - stately aloof
jetsetting know-it-all from one of Evelyn Waugh's non-comic novels, fluent
in art, literature and cocktail recipies. Seems to do the trick. I am the
kind of girl who makes it absolutely who's in control so this seems to fit
in quite well. 

How about the rest of you then ???

Camille
verona_beach@geocities.com



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

• Next message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: I beg to differ than that..."
• Previous message: Camille Scaysbrook: "Re: lowercase will is back not to basics"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "advice to Camille"
• Next in thread: Paul Kennedy: "Re: advice to Camille"