> for subsequent publication. It never really fit in with my idea of Muriel. > If anything, it sounds like something her mother would tell her to do, in > order to protect her financial interest in the poems. What does everyone > else think? It is out of character, I always thought. But: > P.S. I've also always thought that it was a handy device Salinger used > that allows him to talk them up, so to speak, without having to actually > produce these world-class poems. Maybe he didn't trust himself to not > disappoint? It was a problem John Irving faced in The World According to Garp. In order to make Garp a credible fiction writer, Irving had to write a "Garp" story, which he did, and it appears in the book as "The Pension Grillparzer." I've always thought it was a convenient out for Salinger; it avoids ridicule and it preserves a sense of mystery about Seymour and his poetry. --tim