Somehow, his silent understanding and >communication was at the heart of love--maybe why muriel and semour got >hitched can't be said with words? Maybe why the small man quickly became >buddy's >best friend in a car and room full of >vulgarians trying to understand what can probably only be understood by >the couple. (Even Seymours' journal doesn't really explain things.) Love >is simply too confusing to explain well and with words, I still think the old man's presence was some manifestation of Tao, Wu Way...But I'm agreeing with you. Love isn't to be understood, let alone discussed--simply felt...right? Then why were Seymour's professions of love so moving, and important? Well...maybe because he wasn't trying to understand...just to feel. Sorry; I'm just thinking out loud--er, thinking on-screen, as it were. But my real question isn't about the old man so much as Buddy's change in attitude toward him... Buddy wasn't trying to understand love... Buddy was simply trying to make it through an accidental day, defending his brother from lies and misunderstanding... But upon reading Seymour's journal, he's sort of thrust himself into the emotions that are the substance of the sort of logistical Seymour that he's been protecting all day... Why did this seem to upset him...? To throw him from the sort of innocence--no not innocence...at least detachment...? I don't know. His reaction just seemed curious to me, and Salinger's use of his drunkenness (which I discussed in my earlier post) suggests something sadder to me than simple exhaustion. Brendan Free web-based email, Forever, From anywhere! http://www.mailexcite.com