Re: clarification

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: helena kim: "Re: How much of this list deals with JD Salinger?"
• Previous message: Emily Friedman: "Re: How much of this list deals with JD Salinger?"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "clarification"
• Next in thread: June Kitzman: "Re: clarification"

>     Well now we know where we stand.
> 
>     It should perhaps have been made clear to him 
>     that at the end of each month all posts by new 
>     subscribers are reviewed by a small Watch Subcommittee 
>     of the list. (Present members: Tim O'Connor, 
>     Matt Kozusko, Camille Scaybrook & myself.)
> 
>     Our function is to ensure a sufficiently high level 
>     of articulacy & diputatiousness.  Subscribers falling 
>     below that level are ruthlessly airbrushed out.
> 
>     Scottie B.
>      
I hope that I am not one of these people who are "ruthlessly
airbrushed out."
-Liz Friedman 
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

• Next message: helena kim: "Re: How much of this list deals with JD Salinger?"
• Previous message: Emily Friedman: "Re: How much of this list deals with JD Salinger?"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "clarification"
• Next in thread: June Kitzman: "Re: clarification"