Malcolm Lawrence wrote: > > Brian Hall wrote: > > > If you've taken many literature > > courses you would realize where the unfortunately passed-on Mr. Ginsberg > > stands in relation to other poets. He wasn't an exceptional poet, > > people are concerned more with what he had to say. THat's why we didn't > > mind when he scribbled so much nonsense down along with the good stuff. > > He was the 20th century's most necessary poet and as important as Whitman, > yet his poetry was just one of the ways in which he was important. I love the man, too folks. What people always have to say is that he was important for other reasons. No, he CERTAINLY was not the most important poet of our era, and no he does not stand toe to toe with those great poets Mr. Hockman mentioned. THat's simply not true. It's cool to like GInsberg for sure, because what he had to say was beautiful and important. Nevertheless, even Howl was an extremely messy poem with plenty of bad points to its good. I'm afraid Mr. Ginsberg will simply not be remembered in the way so many people want to think. Let's get some perspective on this guy, please.