Re: a couple of points

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: WILL HOCHMAN: "Re: Seymour shoots Muriel?"
• Previous message: WILL HOCHMAN: "Re: a few more (humble) points"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "a couple of points"
• Next in thread: Hapworth2: "Re: a couple of points"

maybe context is everything, but for the record, I think you are setting
up a phony dichotomy, will

On Fri, 16 Jan 1998, Peggy F. Jean-Louis wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Jan 1998, WILL HOCHMAN wrote:
> 
> > I don't see the brilliance and didn't enjoy the tone...will
> > 
> Although ecas probably won't enjoy it, I'll try to explain why I thought
> it was brilliant and why I thoroughly enjoyed it's tone. I don't expect to 
> succeed completely, I don't have the command of language that so many of
> my fellow Bananafish do, but I'll do my best. 
> ecas's (and I'm using lowercase letters because that's how Eryk chooses to
> designate himself and I respect that) post was so raw, so honest...so
> *real* that it evoked Holden's voice. That aggrieved tone is exactly the
> one I would expect Holden to have if he found himself in a similiar
> situation. After so many cerebral posts, it was refreshing to read one
> that came from the gut, not the head.
> 
> Peggy 
> 
> 
> 

• Next message: WILL HOCHMAN: "Re: Seymour shoots Muriel?"
• Previous message: WILL HOCHMAN: "Re: a few more (humble) points"
• Maybe in reply to: Scottie Bowman: "a couple of points"
• Next in thread: Hapworth2: "Re: a couple of points"