---blah b b blah <jrovira@juno.com> wrote: > > Dead Horses Galore. . . > > Ok, I finished it. Enjoyed it a lot. Yes, the 21st chapter was > Indispensable. If he had just left off being the same old nadsat he was > before he'd be denying the reality of choice just as much as if he'd > reformed through the use of conditioning his responses. I thought the > scene where he got sick reading the Bible due to his conditioning was > especially apropos :) > > The most interesting thing about the book was its use of language, of > course, but most of the meaning seemed pretty well right on the surface. > Besides the language it's probably the least sophisticated of all the > Burgess I've read so far. The dual introductions were especiallly > entertaining ;) But it twas an enjoyable read and his point was well > taken.... > > Jim > I'm glad you liked it. I read it over the summer. What is interesting is that I have a friend who speaks Russian and she told me that a lot of the slang words used in the book are similar to Russian words. It is a great book, I haven't read any others by him. Are they similar to Clockwork Orange, or are they totally different? -Liz Friedman > _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com