Re: Have this one no me


Subject: Re: Have this one no me
From: Mattis Fishman (mattis@argoscomp.com)
Date: Tue Mar 28 2000 - 14:55:31 EST


  Just to make it easier to follow, I quote charlotte quoting myself:

>From: Mattis Fishman <mattis@argoscomp.com>
>
>charlotte wrote:
>
> >(my husband kept pestering me as to why. men!) (sorry, guys)
>
>No, no, that should read: guys! (sorry, men) (:
>

  and then the lady herself:

>mattis,
>sorry if i got that wrong.i was trying to shield myself (from projectiles)
>with the more familiar 'guys' addressed to the 'men' and 'boys' on this
>list. (if i indeed understand your post.)
>
>and what does this mean: (:
>
>more marbles,
>charlotte

  Dear charlotte,

  I do not think any apology is called for, as I believe that
  the imprecise nature of my witticism left it open to whatever
  interpretation, if any, you would find most humorous[footnote 1].
  Unless, of course, you are apologizing for not calling me Mattis,
  reducing me to a common noun.

  As for what the glyph (: signifies, that also depends on the interpretation
  of its deliberately ambiguous placement. If you understand it as my own
  addition, sort of laughing at my own joke, then it is an austral smiley (sp?).
  Whereas if it is to be interpreted as part of my suggested correction,
  then it is an austral smiley (:

  all the best,
  Mattis

  [1] it is really not worth explaining what I meant with this silly
  joke, but I would rather look foolish than appear to be making a joke at
  charlotte's expense (I would even rather appear too American and
  oversensitive, but's that's how it is, even if I am not as nice as I pretend).
  All I meant was that to me it made more sense that the complaint use the
  once derogatory "guys", whereas one would presumably apologize to real
  "men", whose behavior would be not be in question.
-
* Unsubscribing? Mail majordomo@roughdraft.org with the message
* UNSUBSCRIBE BANANAFISH



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Sat Apr 01 2000 - 10:11:41 EST